The EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) is the European Union’s carbon pricing mechanism, and from 2024 it includes maritime transport. It places a cost on greenhouse gas emissions from ships by requiring companies to monitor emissions (under EU MRV) and surrender tradable emission allowances.
| Element | IMO Net Zero Framework |
|---|---|
| Mechanism | Global Greenhouse Gas Fuel Intensity (GFI) regulation and IMO Net-Zero Fund |
| Cost driver | Two-tier GHG pricing via Remedial Units (RUs) for non-compliance; revenue recycling and rewards for zero and near-zero fuels |
| Ship threshold | ≥ 5 000 GT |
| Geographic scope | Global, international shipping |
| Gases covered | Well-to-wake GHG intensity (CO₂, CH₄, N₂O) |
| Start date | Proposed: entry into force around 2027, compliance from 2028 |
| ISM Company – operationally responsible company | Owner / Operator / ISM company |
The International Maritime Organization (IMO) is developing a global regulatory framework intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping in line with the 2023 IMO GHG Strategy, which aims to achieve net-zero emissions from international shipping by or around 2050.
At the 83rd session of the Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC 83), member states advanced discussions on mid-term measures designed to drive this transition. The proposed regulatory package forms part of the evolving IMO Net-Zero Framework (NZF) and would be introduced through a new Chapter 5 of MARPOL Annex VI.
The framework has not yet been formally adopted. Draft amendments were approved for further consideration, and adoption is expected to be discussed at a future MEPC session. If adopted, the measures could enter into force around 2027, with the first compliance period expected to begin in 2028.
The proposed framework introduces a global mechanism to regulate the greenhouse gas fuel intensity (GFI) of energy used onboard ships.
GFI represents the life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions per unit of energy, expressed in grams of CO₂-equivalent per megajoule (gCO₂eq/MJ). The metric accounts for well-to-wake emissions, including upstream emissions from fuel production and distribution as well as emissions generated during ship operation.
Instead of implementing a single global carbon price, the framework combines:
The system is intended to accelerate the transition toward low-carbon fuels and energy technologies, while providing financial support for the global maritime energy transition.
Geographical coverage:
The proposed framework would apply to international voyages worldwide, regardless of the ship’s flag.
Domestic voyages conducted entirely within the jurisdictionof a single state would fall outside the scope of the regulation.
Ship size threshold:
The regulation would apply to ships of 5,000 gross tonnage and above engaged in international shipping.
This threshold aligns with other IMO regulatory frameworks, including fuel consumption reporting under the IMO Data Collection System (DCS).
Greenhouse gases/ metrics covered:
The framework measures greenhouse gas emissions on a well-to-wake basis.
This includes the following gases:
Lifecycle emissions would be calculated using IMO life-cycle assessment guidelines, which cover emissions from fuel production, transport, bunkering and onboard use.
The regulation therefore expands the emissions boundary beyond traditional tank-to-wake accounting, ensuring that upstream emissions associated with alternative fuels are also considered.
Exemptions:
Domestic trades are outside scope; further exclusions remain draft and may change.
The framework was approved at MEPC 83 (2025). The formal adoption is expected at an extraordinary MEPC session. If adopted
Ships are expected to establish accounts within the IMO GFI Registry prior to the start of the compliance period to manage reporting and compliance balances.
GFI- Compliance Timeline
.png)
Responsibility for compliance would rest with the “Company” as defined under the International Safety Management (ISM) Code. This typically refers to the shipowner or the entity responsible for operational management of the vessel, holding the Document of Compliance (DoC).
Remedial Units and carbon pricing
The framework introduces a form of global emissions pricing through the purchase of remedial units.
For the initial implementation period 2028–2030, the proposed prices are:
| Tier | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Tier 1 RU | USD 100 per tonne CO2eq |
| Tier 2 RU | USD 280 per tonne CO2eq |
IMO Net-Zero Fund
Payments associated with remedial units would be collected in a dedicated IMO Net-Zero Fund.
The fund is expected to support several objectives, including:
Ships using zero or near-zero emission technologies and fuels may be eligible for financial rewards under the framework.
GHG Fuel Intensity (GFI) pathway
The regulatory trajectory is based on a reference value of approximately 93.3 gCO₂eq/MJ, corresponding to the lifecycle emissions intensity of conventional marine fuels.
Reduction targets for the first implementation period have been proposed for 2028–2035, with longer-term milestones extending toward 2040.
The framework anticipates a 65% reduction in GFI by 2040 relative to the reference value, consistent with the IMO’s broader climate ambitions.
Further targets beyond 2035 are expected to be determined by the IMO before 2032, allowing the regulatory trajectory to evolve as technologies and fuel markets develop.
Compliance mechanism
The IMO Net-Zero Framework introduces two regulatory targets that determine compliance.

Each ship would calculate its attained annual GFI, based on the weighted average lifecycle emissions intensity of the fuels and energy used during the reporting year.
This value would then be compared against the regulatory targets to determine the ship’s compliance balance.
.png)
Compliance outcomes
Three compliance outcomes are possible:
1. Surplus (over-compliance)
Ships operating below the Tier 1 target would generate Surplus Units (SUs). These units could be:
2. Tier 1 deficit
Ships with emissions between the two targets would generate a Tier 1 deficit.
This deficit would be addressed through the purchase of Tier 1 Remedial Units (RUs).
3. Tier 2 deficit
Ships exceeding the Tier 2 target would generate a larger deficit.
Operators would need to either:
This structure is designed to ensure that the system generates predictable revenue while maintaining a strong incentive for fuel switching.
The proposed framework is expected to influence multiple aspects of maritime operations, including:
As regulatory targets tighten over time, compliance will increasingly depend on the availability, scalability and cost competitiveness of low-carbon fuels and energy technologies.
For shipping companies, integrating emissions data, lifecycle fuel analysis and regulatory forecasting into operational planning will be essential for managing long-term regulatory exposure and optimizing fleet strategy.
IMO NFZ vs other IMO regulations
The IMO Net-Zero Framework is intended to complement existing efficiency regulations such as:
While EEXI and CII focus primarily on ship design efficiency and operational performance, the Net-Zero Framework regulates the lifecycle emissions intensity of fuels and energy sources used by ships.
It therefore represents a significant expansion of the IMO’s regulatory approach to maritime decarbonisation.

Stavanger:
Smedvig building
Løkkeveien 107
4007 Stavanger, Norway
Oslo:
Rebel building
Universitetsgata 2
0164 Oslo